Research Prompt: Comparative Evaluation of G1 vs G2 / EMIR
You are participating in a comparative research procedure on the origin of biological information.
The study compares two explanatory frameworks:
G1 — Abiogenesis + Evolution
Biological code and primary heritable information arise locally on early Earth through prebiotic chemistry, self-organization, random variation,
selection, replication, and subsequent evolution.
G2 / EMIR — Electromagnetic Information Resonance
Primary algorithmic information arises outside Earth, is transmitted by a structured physical signal,
is recorded in the molecular environment of early Earth, and then unfolds through evolution into the biosphere.
The central research problem is the origin of biological code, information, and algorithmic organization.
Current scientific knowledge contains strong partial models of prebiotic chemistry and evolution,
but the full transition from chemistry to biological code remains an open explanatory problem.
Your task is to evaluate each submitted Framework Cell by comparing how the current scientific evidence fits G1 and G2 / EMIR.
For each Cell, analyze:
1. Explanatory strength for G1
How strongly does the current scientific evidence support G1 for this criterion?
Score from 0 to 100.
2. Explanatory strength for G2 / EMIR
How strongly does the current scientific evidence support G2 / EMIR for this criterion?
Score from 0 to 100.
3. Discriminatory power / D
How strongly does this criterion distinguish between G1 and G2 / EMIR?
Score from 0 to 5.
4. Comparative score / S
Calculate:
S = D × (G2 − G1) / 100
Where:
Evaluate the specific Framework Cell, not the general reputation or familiarity of either hypothesis.
For each Cell, answer in this structure:
Cell ID and title1. Scientific assessment
Briefly summarize the relevant scientific context.
2. Relevance to G1
Explain how this criterion supports or weakens G1.
3. Relevance to G2 / EMIR
Explain how this criterion supports or weakens G2 / EMIR.
4. Scores
State one of the following:
List the main unresolved scientific questions affecting the evaluation.
Final aggregation after all 100 Framework Cells
Do not calculate percentage support for individual Cells
After all 100 Framework Cells have been evaluated, calculate the total comparative score:
Total S = ΣSᵢ
where Sᵢ is the comparative score of each individual Cell.
The theoretical range for 100 Cells is:
−500 ≤ Total S ≤ +500
Then convert the total score into a percentage result:
EMIR Support % = 50 + Total S / 10
G1 Support % = 100 − EMIR Support %
Interpretation:
Final Comparative Result
State whether the full Framework result favors G1, favors G2 / EMIR, or remains balanced.
You are participating in a comparative research procedure on the origin of biological information.
The study compares two explanatory frameworks:
G1 — Abiogenesis + Evolution
Biological code and primary heritable information arise locally on early Earth through prebiotic chemistry, self-organization, random variation,
selection, replication, and subsequent evolution.
G2 / EMIR — Electromagnetic Information Resonance
Primary algorithmic information arises outside Earth, is transmitted by a structured physical signal,
is recorded in the molecular environment of early Earth, and then unfolds through evolution into the biosphere.
The central research problem is the origin of biological code, information, and algorithmic organization.
Current scientific knowledge contains strong partial models of prebiotic chemistry and evolution,
but the full transition from chemistry to biological code remains an open explanatory problem.
Your task is to evaluate each submitted Framework Cell by comparing how the current scientific evidence fits G1 and G2 / EMIR.
For each Cell, analyze:
1. Explanatory strength for G1
How strongly does the current scientific evidence support G1 for this criterion?
Score from 0 to 100.
2. Explanatory strength for G2 / EMIR
How strongly does the current scientific evidence support G2 / EMIR for this criterion?
Score from 0 to 100.
3. Discriminatory power / D
How strongly does this criterion distinguish between G1 and G2 / EMIR?
Score from 0 to 5.
4. Comparative score / S
Calculate:
S = D × (G2 − G1) / 100
Where:
- negative S favors G1;
- positive S favors G2 / EMIR;
- S near zero means the criterion is neutral or weakly discriminating.
Evaluate the specific Framework Cell, not the general reputation or familiarity of either hypothesis.
For each Cell, answer in this structure:
Cell ID and title1. Scientific assessment
Briefly summarize the relevant scientific context.
2. Relevance to G1
Explain how this criterion supports or weakens G1.
3. Relevance to G2 / EMIR
Explain how this criterion supports or weakens G2 / EMIR.
4. Scores
- G1 =
- G2 / EMIR =
- D =
- S =
State one of the following:
- favors G1;
- favors G2 / EMIR;
- neutral or underdetermined.
List the main unresolved scientific questions affecting the evaluation.
Final aggregation after all 100 Framework Cells
Do not calculate percentage support for individual Cells
After all 100 Framework Cells have been evaluated, calculate the total comparative score:
Total S = ΣSᵢ
where Sᵢ is the comparative score of each individual Cell.
The theoretical range for 100 Cells is:
−500 ≤ Total S ≤ +500
Then convert the total score into a percentage result:
EMIR Support % = 50 + Total S / 10
G1 Support % = 100 − EMIR Support %
Interpretation:
- 50% = balanced support between G1 and G2 / EMIR;
- above 50% = stronger comparative support for G2 / EMIR;
- below 50% = stronger comparative support for G1.
- G1 score;
- G2 / EMIR score;
- D score;
- S score;
- conclusion for that Cell.
Final Comparative Result
- Number of evaluated Cells = 100
- Total S =
- EMIR Support % =
- G1 Support % =
State whether the full Framework result favors G1, favors G2 / EMIR, or remains balanced.
© 2026 EMIR Hypothesis. All rights reserved.
info@emir-hypothesis.org
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use
Контакты